Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a transfer of income-tax cases under Section 127(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 automatically conferred jurisdiction on the same officer to function as Wealth-tax Officer under Section 8 of the Wealth-tax Act, or whether a separate notification under Section 8AA of the Wealth-tax Act was .
Analysis: Section 8 of the Wealth-tax Act makes the Income-tax Officer having jurisdiction or exercising powers under the Income-tax Act the Wealth-tax Officer for the same assessee. Once a valid transfer order is issued under Section 127(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the officer so notified acquires jurisdiction under the Income-tax Act, and that jurisdiction operates co-extensively for wealth-tax purposes as well. Section 8AA is an independent enabling provision and is relevant where there is no transfer under Section 127(1); it does not require a fresh notification when jurisdiction has already been validly conferred under the Income-tax Act.
Conclusion: A separate notification under Section 8AA of the Wealth-tax Act was not required, and the officer had jurisdiction to complete the wealth-tax assessments. The finding of the Tribunal on lack of jurisdiction was erroneous and was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.