Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Scheme of Arrangement providing for amalgamation of the transferor company with the transferee company and consequential reduction of preference share capital deserved sanction, and whether the related confirmation of minutes under section 103(1) was warranted.
Analysis: The Scheme had been approved by the requisite classes of shareholders and creditors, with meetings dispensed with on the basis of written consents. No objections were received after advertisement of the petitions. The Official Liquidator reported that the affairs of the transferor company had been conducted within its objects and not prejudicially to members or public interest, while seeking preservation of books and records under section 396A. The Regional Director's observations were met by undertakings and disclosures, including compliance with accounting standards and income-tax law. The reduction of preference share capital was consequential to amalgamation and did not involve diminution of liability in respect of unpaid share capital or payment to shareholders of paid-up capital, so the procedure for reduction was dispensed with. The Court found the Scheme to be in the interest of shareholders, creditors, and the public interest.
Conclusion: The Scheme of Arrangement was sanctioned, the consequential reduction of preference share capital was confirmed, and the minutes under section 103(1) were approved.