<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1059 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329350</link>
    <description>A Scheme of Arrangement for amalgamation of the transferor company with the transferee company was sanctioned because it had received the required shareholder and creditor approval, no objections were filed after advertisement, and the Official Liquidator reported no prejudice to members or public interest. The Regional Director&#039;s concerns were addressed through undertakings and disclosures, including compliance with accounting standards and income-tax law. The consequential reduction of preference share capital was also confirmed because it followed from the amalgamation and did not involve diminution of unpaid share capital liability or payment out of paid-up capital, so the reduction procedure was dispensed with. The related minutes under section 103(1) were approved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:44:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1059 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329350</link>
      <description>A Scheme of Arrangement for amalgamation of the transferor company with the transferee company was sanctioned because it had received the required shareholder and creditor approval, no objections were filed after advertisement, and the Official Liquidator reported no prejudice to members or public interest. The Regional Director&#039;s concerns were addressed through undertakings and disclosures, including compliance with accounting standards and income-tax law. The consequential reduction of preference share capital was also confirmed because it followed from the amalgamation and did not involve diminution of unpaid share capital liability or payment out of paid-up capital, so the reduction procedure was dispensed with. The related minutes under section 103(1) were approved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>