Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's contribution to the employees' pension fund constituted a fringe benefit chargeable under section 115WB(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The contribution was made under a statutory pension arrangement applicable to bank employees and was linked to the earlier provident fund framework. The fund was treated as an approved superannuation fund, but the decisive question was whether the lump-sum contribution made under the scheme could be brought within the charging provision for fringe benefits. The scheme was a defined benefit arrangement, the contribution was made to secure pension obligations under a statutory regime, and the Tribunal followed the view that such contribution, being in lieu of provident fund and not an extra or voluntary employee benefit, did not attract fringe benefit taxation on the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The contribution to the pension fund was not liable to be treated as a fringe benefit under section 115WB(1)(c); the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.