TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court clarifies eligibility for deductions under section 80J and investment allowance</h1> The High Court analyzed the interpretation of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's order regarding deductions under section 80J and investment allowance. ... Industrial undertaking - Assessee sought deductions u/s 80J on the gross total income before allowance - Whether Tribunal was right in law in allowing deduction u/s 80J and investment allowance of the current year before allowing depreciation of the current year – held that, before allowing deduction under section 80J, the gross total income which is arrived at after granting of deductions for the previous year prior thereto has to be considered - question is answered in favour of the Revenue Issues:1. Interpretation of the order dated August 8, 1989, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding deduction under section 80J and investment allowance.2. Whether deduction under section 80J should be allowed before depreciation and investment allowance of the current year.Issue 1: Interpretation of Tribunal's OrderThe High Court analyzed the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the subsequent decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The court observed that the issue revolved around the sequence of allowing deductions under section 80J and investment allowance before or after depreciation. The court reframed the substantial question of law to address this specific concern.Issue 2: Order of Deduction under Section 80JThe assessee, engaged in the spinning business, claimed deductions under section 80J and investment allowance. The Assessing Officer initially disallowed these deductions before depreciation, but the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee. The Revenue contended that the Tribunal's decision contradicted the provisions of sections 80AB and 80B(5) of the Income-tax Act, which outline the calculation of deductions under Chapter VI-A. The court examined relevant precedents and legal provisions to determine the correct approach.Precedents and Legal AnalysisThe court referred to various judgments, including CIT v. Vishnu Oil and Dal Mills, CIT v. Kotagiri Industrial Co-operative Tea Factory Ltd., and others, to understand the interpretation of deductions under different sections of the Income-tax Act. These cases highlighted the importance of calculating deductions based on net income rather than gross income. The court emphasized that deductions under section 80J should be computed on the gross total income after considering previous year's deductions.DecisionAfter considering the arguments and legal precedents, the court concluded that deductions under section 80J should be allowed after accounting for previous year's deductions. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the gross total income, calculated after granting deductions for the previous year, should be considered before allowing deductions under section 80J. The court disposed of the reference accordingly, aligning with the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents.This detailed analysis of the judgment from the Punjab and Haryana High Court provides a comprehensive understanding of the issues involved, the legal arguments presented, and the court's decision based on the interpretation of the Income-tax Act and relevant case law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
