Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether grey fabrics held by a registered dealer were eligible as "input" for availing CENVAT credit under Notification No. 35/2003-CE (NT) dated 10.04.2003, and whether the credit demand, interest and penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: The applicable notification permitted credit on specified fabrics lying in stock or in process and on inputs contained in finished goods lying in stock. The reasoning adopted was that grey fabrics purchased for further processing retain their character as inputs; the introduction of a dealer between the manufacturer and the processor does not alter that nature. The issue was treated as no longer res integra in view of prior Tribunal and High Court decisions, and the view was that such grey fabrics are inputs in the hands of the dealer and processor for the purposes of the notification.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to avail credit under the relevant entry treating the grey fabrics as input. The demand of credit, interest and penalty could not stand.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Grey fabrics do not lose their character as inputs merely because a dealer intervenes between the manufacturer and the processor, and credit under the relevant transitional notification is available accordingly.