Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax could be demanded prior to 1.1.2005 on the recipient of consulting engineer services received from a non-resident or from outside India, and whether the corresponding demand and penalties on the non-resident service provider and recipient were sustainable.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that a consulting engineer service provided by a non-resident or from outside India, having no office in India, became a taxable service only with effect from 1.1.2005 under the relevant notification. On that footing, the recipient could not be fastened with service tax liability for the prior period. The same reasoning also meant that the non-resident provider, in the facts of the case, could not be subjected to the impugned demand.
Conclusion: The demand of service tax and penalties for the period prior to 1.1.2005 were held unsustainable, in favour of the assessee.