Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (11) TMI 83

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l) Shri P.A.S. Rao, Advocate for the appellants. Mrs. A.P. Tiwari, Authorized Departmental Representative (Jt. CDR) for the Revenue.   [Order per: P.K. Das, Member (Judicial)] - A common issue is involved in all these appeals and therefore, all are being taken up together for disposal. 2. Heard both sides and perused record. 3. The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ility service tax on recipient of service provided by a non-resident or from outside India and demand of tax on non-resident of India for providing service to Indian Company are sustainable prior to 1.1.2005. The Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. C.C.E.,, Jaipur - 2008 (11) STR 338 (Tri-LB) held that service recipient  of consulting engineers service by a non....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he "consulting engineer" service from outside India, the appellant was not liable to pay service tax prior to 1.1.2005." 5. It is also observed by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal that where the service provided by outside India or non-resident, who does not have any office in India, the provider of the service cannot be fastened with the liability. In the present case,  Appellant No.1,&nb....