Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional authority was justified in enhancing the penalty under Sections 76 and 78 when the original authority had accepted bona fide conduct and reasonable cause for delayed payment of service tax.
Analysis: The original authority had taken a reasonable view on the assessee's conduct and accepted that there was bona fide action in making belated deposit of service tax along with interest. In such circumstances, the precedent relied upon supported the view that where reasonable cause and bona fides are found, the revisional authority should not interfere to enhance the penalty. The decision distinguishing the contrary precedent was accepted on the basis that there the penalties had not been dropped on any comparable finding of reasonable cause.
Conclusion: The revisional enhancement of penalty was not sustainable and the appeal succeeded.