Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (7) TMI 162

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ms. Sudha Koka, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order (Oral)]. - This appeal arises from Order-in-Revision No. 67/2006 dated 12-12-2006 by which the Commissioner has imposed penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, which had been dropped by the Assistant Commissioner. He has imposed Rs. 200/- per day under Section 76 and enhanced the penalty from 25,000/- to 4,00,000/- in terms of Section 78 of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he penalty. 2. The learned Counsel submits that this very issue was examined by the Tribunal in the case of Majestic Mobikes v. CCE, by Final Order No. 652-672/2008, dated 30-5-2008 [2008 (11) S.T.R. 609 (Tribunal)] and after detailed examination held that once the Original Authority has exercised his power reasonably and found bona fides on the part of the assessee in relation to deposits, the....