Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the amendment of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, freight from the factory to the depot and transit insurance were includible in the assessable value where the goods were cleared only from depots at a uniform price.
Analysis: The amended valuation provision was held not to apply to the assessee's case because the clearances were not made from the factory gate and the goods were sold from depots at a uniform price throughout the country. On that footing, the cost of transportation from the factory to the depot and the transit insurance relating to that movement could not be added to the value for levy of excise duty.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and freight and transit insurance were held to be not includible in the assessable value on these facts.
Final Conclusion: The valuation dispute was resolved in favour of the assessee, while the remaining refund-related question was left for fresh determination after evidence, with the impugned orders set aside to that extent.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are cleared from depots at a uniform price and not from the factory gate, post-amendment valuation does not permit inclusion of factory-to-depot transportation cost and transit insurance in the assessable value.