Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the levy of export pass fee on denatured and specially denatured spirit under Rule 10(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Excise, Import, Export, Transport and Possession of Denatured Spirit (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules, 1989 was constitutionally valid and enforceable.
Analysis: Denatured and specially denatured spirit was held to be outside the legislative competence of the State Legislature, as the field of industrial alcohol in that form fell within the exclusive domain of Parliament. The State could regulate only to the limited extent necessary to prevent surreptitious diversion of rectified spirit into potable liquor, and any fee imposed for that purpose had to bear a broad correlation with the cost of such regulation. The levy in question was not shown to be connected with any additional regulatory burden or service rendered, and it was imposed merely on transportation of denatured spirit from Uttar Pradesh to West Bengal. On that footing, the impost was not a genuine regulatory fee but a levy lacking constitutional support.
Conclusion: The levy was unconstitutional and unenforceable. The impugned notification was quashed, the respondents were restrained from realising the fee, and refund with interest was directed.
Ratio Decidendi: A State cannot levy a fee on denatured spirit beyond its limited regulatory power unless the charge is demonstrably connected with the actual cost of regulation and falls within the State's legislative competence.