Court Corrects Order: Separate Fines to Be Imposed for Confiscated Jewelry and Currency After Typographical Error ate. The HC of Bombay rectified a typographical error in a previous order concerning the confiscation of goods. The Commissioner had originally confiscated ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court Corrects Order: Separate Fines to Be Imposed for Confiscated Jewelry and Currency After Typographical Error ate.
The HC of Bombay rectified a typographical error in a previous order concerning the confiscation of goods. The Commissioner had originally confiscated jewelry and currency, with the Tribunal subsequently imposing a fine without specifying amounts for each. The court instructed the original authority to impose separate fines for the jewelry and currency.
The High Court of Bombay corrected a typographical error in an order. The Commissioner had confiscated goods, and the Tribunal imposed a fine in lieu of confiscation for jewelry and currency without apportioning the amount. The court directed the original authority to consider imposing fines independently for currency and jewelry.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.