<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 1078 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313503</link>
    <description>The HC of Bombay rectified a typographical error in a previous order concerning the confiscation of goods. The Commissioner had originally confiscated jewelry and currency, with the Tribunal subsequently imposing a fine without specifying amounts for each. The court instructed the original authority to impose separate fines for the jewelry and currency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:43:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 1078 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313503</link>
      <description>The HC of Bombay rectified a typographical error in a previous order concerning the confiscation of goods. The Commissioner had originally confiscated jewelry and currency, with the Tribunal subsequently imposing a fine without specifying amounts for each. The court instructed the original authority to impose separate fines for the jewelry and currency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>