TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Order Dismissed: Appeal Under Sec. 35G of Central Excise Act Available, Rules High Court.</h1> <h3>Sachin Jain Versus Union of India And 2 Others</h3> The HC of Allahabad dismissed the petition as non-maintainable, determining that the Tribunal's order could be contested through an appeal under Sec. 35G ... Maintainability of petition - availability of alternative statutory remedy by filing appeal - respondent nos. 2 and 3 submitted that he has not been provided the copy of writ petition but he has been told that by means of this petition the order of Tribunal has been assailed, therefore, this petition is not maintainable - HELD THAT:- There are substance in the submission of respondent nos. 2 and 3, therefore, assailing the order of Tribunal may not be maintainable. This petition is dismissed being not maintainable - However, the liberty is given to the petitioner to file an appeal u/s 35 G of Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the petition as not maintainable since the order of the Tribunal could be challenged through an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioner was given liberty to file an appeal under Section 35G.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
