Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts of the case, the Assessing Officer was justified in rejecting the incomplete books of account and in making the addition by applying a gross profit rate of 1.5 per cent instead of 0.9 per cent.
Analysis: The books of account remained incomplete till the date of search, justifying invocation of section 145(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On the material available, the Tribunal found that the gross profit rates declared in the immediately preceding years were about 0.78 per cent and 0.9 per cent, and that the rate of 1.5 per cent adopted by the Assessing Officer was on the higher side. The Tribunal therefore directed recalculation of the additions by applying a gross profit rate of 0.9 per cent on total sales.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's view was upheld and the addition was to be recomputed by applying a gross profit rate of 0.9 per cent.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order of the Tribunal was left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the books of account are incomplete and section 145(2) is validly invoked, the estimated gross profit addition must be based on the facts and surrounding record and cannot be sustained if found excessive.