Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant, facing prosecution under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, was entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in view of the quantity recovered, the stage of trial, and the period of custody.
Analysis: The appellant had been in custody for more than two years and seven months. Seven witnesses had already been examined and the remaining evidence had not progressed because of the pandemic. In these circumstances, the Court found that continued custody was no longer warranted and that the appellant deserved the benefit of bail under Section 439 of the Code.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to bail and was ordered to be released on such conditions as the Trial Court deemed appropriate.