Tax Rejection Withdrawn: Petitioner's Application to be Reconsidered; Lower Tax Deductions Maintained Pending Decision.

The Bombay HC disposed of the writ petition after the respondent agreed to withdraw the impugned rejection letter and reconsider the petitioner's application under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act. The court ordered no coercive recovery of tax demands and maintained lower tax deductions at source until the application is decided, without addressing Rule 28AA's validity.

---

---

Issues:
- Petition for writ of certiorari and mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
- Validity and legality of Rule 28AA of the Income Tax Rules
- Continuation of lower deduction of tax at source on the petitioner's income

Analysis:

Issue 1: Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus
The petitioners sought relief through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. They requested the court to quash the impugned letter of rejection issued by Respondent No.1 and to direct the withdrawal, revocation, and granting of the petitioner's application under Section 197 of the Act. After extensive arguments and the filing of an affidavit-in-reply by the respondent, the respondent agreed to withdraw the impugned letter of rejection and to decide the petitioner's application afresh within ten days. The court accepted these undertakings as given to the court, similar to a previous case cited by Mr. Mistri. The court disposed of the writ petition based on these undertakings, with no order as to costs, and directed no recovery of the demand by coercive means until the petitioner's application is decided.

Issue 2: Validity of Rule 28AA of the Income Tax Rules
The petitioners also requested the court to examine the validity and legality of Rule 28AA of the Income Tax Rules and to strike down the rule as ultra vires Section 197 of the Act. However, since the respondent agreed to withdraw the impugned letter and reconsider the petitioner's application under Section 197, the court did not delve into the examination of the rule's validity. The court disposed of the writ petition based on the respondent's undertakings, without addressing the specific issue of the validity of Rule 28AA.

Issue 3: Continuation of Lower Deduction of Tax at Source
The petitioners further requested the court to direct the continuation of lower deduction of tax at source on the petitioner's income until the application is decided. The court ordered that there shall be no recovery of the demand by coercive means until the petitioner's application is disposed of by a speaking order in accordance with the undertakings given to the court. This directive ensures that the petitioner's income tax deductions remain at the lower rate until a decision is made on the application under Section 197 of the Act.

In conclusion, the High Court of Bombay disposed of the writ petition based on the respondent's undertakings to withdraw the impugned letter of rejection and reconsider the petitioner's application under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act. The court also directed the continuation of lower tax deductions at source until a decision is made on the application, without addressing the specific validity of Rule 28AA of the Income Tax Rules.

---