Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the employees of the U.P. Jal Nigam were entitled to continue in service up to the enhanced age of superannuation of 60 years after the State Government amended the general retirement rule for Government servants.
Analysis: Section 37 of the Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 preserved the existing service conditions of employees transferred to the Nigam until those conditions were lawfully altered by the Nigam. Section 97 empowered the Nigam, with previous approval of the State Government, to frame regulations governing service conditions, and Regulation 31 of the 1978 Regulations made the service conditions of Nigam employees governed by the rules, regulations and orders applicable to serving Government servants in the State. The expression was held to include subsequent amendments to those governing rules. As the service regulations were not amended to exclude the revised superannuation age, a mere administrative decision or direction could not override the regulation.
Conclusion: The enhanced retirement age of 60 years applied to the Nigam employees, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where service regulations adopt the rules and orders applicable to Government servants, later amendments to those rules apply unless the regulations are formally amended to exclude them.