TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal complaint and the order taking cognizance disclosed the essential ingredients of the offences under the Indian Penal Code, or whether the dispute was purely civil arising out of an independent contractual obligation.
Analysis: The contractual arrangement between the complainant and the company was independent of the separate contract between the company and the steel plant. Even on the complainant's version, the grievance was non-payment of the balance amount allegedly due under the contract, which in substance concerned recovery of money. The Court held that the money paid under the separate contract was not the complainant's money or movable property, and therefore could not support a charge of misappropriation. The complaint also did not disclose dishonest intention or misappropriation, both of which are necessary ingredients for the alleged offences.
Conclusion: The proceedings were held to be unsustainable in criminal law, and the cognizance order and summons were quashed in favour of the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the dispute arises from separate and independent contracts and the complaint does not disclose the essential ingredients of dishonest intention or misappropriation, criminal process cannot be used to pursue what is essentially a civil claim for money.
TaxTMI 
