Natural justice in admission reduction matters requires prior notice, meaningful hearing, and a reasoned order before adverse action.

An adverse administrative order reducing a medical college's admission strength from 120 to 60 was set aside because the authority acted without giving a reasonable and effective opportunity to respond to the deficiencies in the Standing Committee report. As the decision carried civil consequences, fairness required prior notice, adequate time to reply, and a reasoned determination before any adverse action was taken. The communication and final order were therefore held procedurally infirm, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered after following a fair procedure.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order reducing the admission strength of the petitioner college from 120 to 60 was liable to be set aside for want of reasonable opportunity and violation of the principles of natural justice.

Analysis: The order reducing strength was passed one day after the authority sought a response to the Standing Committee report, and no reasonable time was afforded to the petitioner to answer the deficiencies pointed out. Since the decision entailed civil consequences and was taken on the premise that no reply had been received, fairness required prior notice and a meaningful opportunity to respond before any adverse decision was taken. The communication and the final order were therefore found to be procedurally infirm, and the matter required reconsideration after following a fair procedure and passing a reasoned order.

Conclusion: The impugned order was held invalid and was set aside in favour of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: An adverse administrative decision having civil consequences cannot be sustained unless the affected party is given a reasonable and effective opportunity of hearing before the decision is taken.

---