Redemption premium on FCCBs for overseas investments not taxable income, no TDS required under section 196C

ITAT Pune held that redemption premium on FCCBs borrowed from outside India and utilized for overseas investments does not constitute taxable income in India. The assessee was not required to deduct TDS under section 196C read with section 115AC as the interest income did not accrue or arise in India per section 9(1)(v). Following SC precedent in GE India Technology case, when FCCBs are used for overseas investments, the exclusive clause in section 9(1)(v) exempts such interest from Indian taxation. Consequently, penalty under section 271C for failure to deduct TDS was also deleted as the underlying assessment was quashed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Liability to deduct tax at source under Section 196C read with Section 115AC on interest payable on Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs).
2. Determination of situs of interest income for non-residents under Section 5(2) and Section 9(1)(v) of the Income Tax Act.
3. Applicability of Section 115AC as a self-contained code versus Section 5(2) for deciding taxability.
4. Validity of penalty under Section 271C for failure to deduct tax at source.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Liability to Deduct Tax at Source under Section 196C Read with Section 115AC on Interest Payable on FCCBs:
The Revenue contended that the appellant company erred in not deducting tax at source on the interest payable on FCCBs, arguing that the liability arose under Section 196C read with Section 115AC. The respondent-assessee argued that the FCCBs were utilized outside India for investments/loans to overseas subsidiaries, and thus, no tax deduction was required as the income did not accrue or arise in India under Section 9(1)(v) of the Act. The CIT(A) ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that the interest paid on FCCBs utilized outside India does not accrue in India, thus no tax deduction was necessary.

2. Determination of Situs of Interest Income for Non-Residents under Section 5(2) and Section 9(1)(v) of the Income Tax Act:
The Revenue argued that the interest income should be considered to have accrued in India under Section 5(2). However, the CIT(A) held that both Section 5(2) and Section 9(1)(v) should be considered, and concluded that the interest paid on FCCBs falls under the exception provided in Section 9(1)(v)(b), thus, it does not accrue in India. The Tribunal upheld this view, emphasizing that the provisions of Section 9(1)(v) specifically exclude such interest income from being deemed to accrue or arise in India when the funds are utilized outside India.

3. Applicability of Section 115AC as a Self-Contained Code versus Section 5(2) for Deciding Taxability:
The Revenue contended that Section 115AC should be considered a self-contained code, and thus, the taxability should be determined under this section alone. However, the CIT(A) and the Tribunal concluded that Section 115AC does not override the provisions of Section 5(2) and Section 9(1)(v). The Tribunal noted that the interest income, as defined under Section 2(28A), when utilized for business or investments outside India, does not accrue in India under the exclusion provided in Section 9(1)(v)(b).

4. Validity of Penalty under Section 271C for Failure to Deduct Tax at Source:
The penalty under Section 271C was levied based on the TDS Officer's order under Section 201(1) and 201(1A). Since the CIT(A) quashed the TDS Officer's order and the Tribunal upheld this decision, the basis for the penalty no longer existed. Consequently, the CIT(A) rightly deleted the penalty, and the Tribunal confirmed this deletion, stating that without the underlying liability, the penalty could not be sustained.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that no tax deduction at source was required on the interest payable on FCCBs utilized outside India, as the interest income did not accrue or arise in India under Section 9(1)(v). Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the deletion of the penalty under Section 271C, as the basis for the penalty was invalidated by the quashing of the TDS Officer's order.

---