IT company must include forex gains in operating revenue but exclude donations for transfer pricing analysis

ITAT Bangalore ruled on transfer pricing adjustments for an IT services company. The tribunal held that foreign exchange gains arising from software development service realization must be included in operating revenue as they occur in normal business course. However, donations should be excluded from operating revenue as they are not part of normal business activities. Regarding comparable selection, the tribunal excluded Accentia Technologies Ltd. due to amalgamation impact, eClerx Services Ltd. for providing functionally different high-end specialized services, and remanded Cosmic Global Ltd.'s comparability issue to TPO for fresh examination given insufficient prior consideration of its low-volume BPO segment.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Re-computation of the arm's length price and related transfer pricing adjustments.
2. Exclusion of certain comparable companies from the final set of comparables.
3. Inclusion of foreign exchange gain in operating revenue.
4. Exclusion of donations from operating revenue.
5. Initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Re-computation of the Arm's Length Price and Related Transfer Pricing Adjustments:

The assessee adopted the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) using Net cost plus mark up and the Profit Level Indicator (PLI). The assessee chose 8 companies as comparables with an average profit margin of 4.34%. The TPO rejected this comparability analysis, conducted his own search, and selected 8 different comparables with an average margin of 25.04%. After adjustments, the TPO computed the Arm's Length Price (ALP) adjustment at Rs. 1,04,14,489, which was later revised to Rs. 1,77,38,145 by the DRP.

2. Exclusion of Certain Comparable Companies from the Final Set of Comparables:

Accentia Technologies Ltd.:
The Tribunal excluded Accentia Technologies Ltd. from the list of comparables due to the occurrence of extraordinary events such as amalgamation, which impacted the financial results, making it non-comparable to the assessee.

eClerx Services Ltd.:
eClerx Services Ltd. was also excluded from the list of comparables as it was engaged in providing high-end services involving specialized knowledge and domain expertise, rendering it functionally different from the assessee.

Cosmic Global Ltd.:
The Tribunal remanded the issue of including Cosmic Global Ltd. back to the TPO for fresh examination. The decision was based on the fact that the comparable segment, i.e., Accounts BPO segment, had a low volume of sales compared to the entity level, and this finding required verification.

3. Inclusion of Foreign Exchange Gain in Operating Revenue:

The Tribunal held that foreign exchange gain should be included in the operating revenue while computing the margin. This decision was based on the fact that foreign exchange fluctuation arose from the realization of consideration for rendering services, thus occurring in the normal course of business.

4. Exclusion of Donations from Operating Revenue:

The Tribunal directed that donations should be excluded from operating revenue while computing the margin, as donations are not part of normal business activities.

5. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act:

The Tribunal dismissed the ground related to the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) as infructuous, since no penalty was imposed in the impugned order.

Conclusion:

The appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to exclude certain companies from the list of comparables and to include foreign exchange gain in the operating revenue while excluding donations. The issue of including Cosmic Global Ltd. was remanded for fresh examination. The ground related to penalty proceedings was dismissed as infructuous.

---