Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether any further clarification was required regarding the continuation of interim protection and whether the petitioner could have the respondent examined by the Medical Board of Dr. RML Hospital.
Analysis: The order recording continuation of the High Court's interim protection was treated as clear and unambiguous. It was held that nothing in the Supreme Court's order prevented examination of the respondent by the Medical Board, and no observation had been made on that aspect. The Court also noted that the medical examination was intended to ensure that protection on medical grounds was not misused. In view of the pending proceedings before the Supreme Court, the petitioner was permitted to seek such examination subject to the Supreme Court's orders.
Conclusion: No further clarification was required, and the petitioner was at liberty to have the respondent examined by the Medical Board subject to the orders of the Supreme Court.