Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the judgment debtor could, in execution proceedings, challenge the validity of an arbitral award and resist its enforcement after having withdrawn the earlier challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Analysis: The judgment debtor had already invoked Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to question the award but did not pursue that remedy and withdrew it. The statutory scheme of Sections 34, 35 and 36 makes Section 34 the proper remedy for setting aside an award, limits the grounds on which an award may be impeached, and provides that once the time for such challenge expires or the challenge fails, the award attains finality and is enforceable as a decree of court. The objection sought to be raised in execution was therefore an indirect attempt to reopen an award that had already become final. The Court treated Section 34 as the appropriate and parallel remedy in place of such collateral resistance in execution.
Conclusion: The objection application was not maintainable and was dismissed. The award remained enforceable, and the execution petition was treated as satisfied.
Final Conclusion: A party cannot bypass the statutory challenge under Section 34 and later resist execution by collateral objections to the validity of the arbitral award once the award has attained finality.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a specific remedy to set aside an arbitral award, and that remedy is not pursued to conclusion, the award attains finality and cannot be collaterally challenged in execution proceedings.