Land acquisition notice in a dead owner's name was not void, and subsequent purchasers could not challenge the acquisition.

A notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued in the name of a dead recorded owner was not automatically void, because the acquisition scheme requires notice to persons interested at different stages and does not compel the authority to make a roving enquiry into every owner's survival unless the death is brought to its notice. The Court distinguished acquisition proceedings from strict proceedings against dead persons and noted that such defect does not by itself nullify the process. Subsequent purchasers who bought the plots after the award and taking of possession were not entitled to challenge the acquisition.

---

---

Issues: Whether a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued in the name of a dead person was void so as to invalidate the acquisition proceedings, and whether subsequent purchasers who bought the plots after the award and possession could challenge the acquisition.

Analysis: The death of the recorded owner, by itself, did not render the acquisition proceedings a nullity. The statutory scheme of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 contemplates notice at different stages to persons interested, and the acquiring authorities are not required to conduct a roving enquiry to verify whether every recorded owner is alive unless the fact of death is brought to their notice at the relevant stage. The Court distinguished proceedings under the Act from strict judicial proceedings against dead persons, and noted that even under Order 22 Rule 4(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, proceedings against a dead person are not invariably void. The appellants were also subsequent purchasers who acquired the plots after the award had been passed and possession taken, and therefore could not maintain the challenge.

Conclusion: The notification was not vitiated merely because it stood in the name of a dead person, and the appellants, being subsequent purchasers, were not entitled to question the acquisition.

Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, a notification issued in the name of a dead person is not automatically void unless the acquiring authority had knowledge of the death at the relevant stage, and subsequent purchasers after award and possession cannot challenge the acquisition.

---