TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rulings on foreign exchange loss, fixed assets, stock adjustments, and prior period expenses</h1> <h3>M/s. Mafatlal Denim Ltd. (formerly known as Mafatlal Burlington Industried Ltd.) Versus DCIT, Circle 9 (2) Mumbai</h3> M/s. Mafatlal Denim Ltd. (formerly known as Mafatlal Burlington Industried Ltd.) Versus DCIT, Circle 9 (2) Mumbai - TMI Issues Involved:1. Claim of exchange loss as revenue expenditure.2. Adjustment u/s 145A.3. Prior period expenses.Issue of Claim of Exchange Loss (Ground Nos. 1 to 7):During assessment, the A.O. observed that the assessee claimed Rs. 1,56,64,040/- as foreign exchange loss, arising from the repayment and revaluation of foreign exchange loans. The A.O. disallowed the claim, considering it capital expenditure since the loans were for project expansion. The CIT(A) upheld this view, stating the loss was notional and not allowable. The Tribunal, however, found that the loans were for working capital and not for acquiring assets, thus not covered by section 43A. Citing the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd., the Tribunal allowed the foreign exchange loss as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1), except for Rs. 18,68,305/- attributable to fixed assets, which should be treated under section 43A.Issue of Adjustment u/s 145A (Ground Nos. 8 & 9):The A.O. adjusted the closing stock for excise duty and Modvat credit without adjusting the opening stock. The CIT(A) confirmed this. The Tribunal directed the A.O. to adjust both opening and closing stocks, following the decisions in Mahalakshmi Glass Works and Mahavir Aluminium, and restored the issue for necessary adjustments.Issue of Prior Period Expenses (Ground Nos. 10 & 11):The A.O. disallowed Rs. 10,15,326/- as prior period expenses. The CIT(A) allowed Textile Committee cess of Rs. 6,33,817/- but disallowed the rest. The Tribunal directed the A.O. to re-examine the write-off of Rs. 1,19,509/- for advances and allow it if not claimed earlier. For legal and professional fees, the Tribunal allowed the deduction, considering the bills were received in the current year and the demand crystallized in this year.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed, directing adjustments and re-examinations as specified. The order was pronounced on 24th September 2010.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
