Appellate Tribunal Upholds Decision Dismissing Appeal on Ownership Claim under Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision, dismissing the appeal challenging the rejection of the Appellant's claim for ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal Upholds Decision Dismissing Appeal on Ownership Claim under Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code
The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision, dismissing the appeal challenging the rejection of the Appellant's claim for ownership of flats under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found the relief sought by the Appellant was not feasible at the time of application, leading to the appeal's dismissal. Despite having paid the full consideration for the flats, the Appellant's claim for ownership was deemed untenable within the insolvency proceedings.
Issues involved: Appeal under Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against rejection of claim by Resolution Professional.
Analysis: The judgment pertains to an appeal filed under section 61 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against a decision by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dated 21.09.2021 in Insolvency Petition CP (IB) 923 (PB) 2018. The Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) had invited claims until 03.09.2019, and the Committee of Creditors (CoC) approved the Resolution Plan on 04.03.2020. The Appellant, however, submitted its claim to the Resolution Professional on 16.06.2020, which was subsequently rejected. The appeal was filed on 19.04.2021 challenging this rejection.
The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the application on 21.09.2021, deeming it infructuous. The Counsel for the Appellant argued that the Appellant had paid the full consideration for 41 flats, thus claiming ownership. However, upon hearing both parties, the Tribunal, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice Jarat Kumar Jain, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, opined that the relief sought by the Appellant could not have been granted at the time of filing the application. Consequently, the Tribunal found no merit in entertaining the appeal and dismissed it in limine.
In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing that the relief sought by the Appellant was not viable at the time of application. The dismissal of the appeal signifies that the Appellant's claim for ownership of the flats, despite paying the full consideration, was not tenable within the insolvency proceedings framework.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.