Security cheques and director liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act turn on enforceability and specific role evidence.
Security cheques issued in contractual dealings may still attract Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act if they become enforceable on default; such questions are ordinarily not finally resolved at the quashing stage, and the statutory presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 operate for trial. Mere description as a director is insufficient for Section 141 liability unless there is specific material showing that the person was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time. On that basis, proceedings continued against the first two petitioners but were quashed for the third petitioner.
Issues: (i) Whether cheques issued as security in the course of contractual dealings, and later dated and presented on alleged default, could be treated as cheques issued in discharge of a debt or other legally enforceable liability for the purpose of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. (ii) Whether a director, who was only designated as such and was not shown to be in charge of or responsible for the company's business in relation to the transactions, could be proceeded against under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Issue (i): Whether cheques issued as security in the course of contractual dealings, and later dated and presented on alleged default, could be treated as cheques issued in discharge of a debt or other legally enforceable liability for the purpose of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Analysis: The contractual relationship between the parties was undisputed, and the cheques were issued in the course of those transactions. The complaint did not expressly state that the cheques were security cheques, but the accompanying materials suggested that the instruments may have been furnished as security for performance of the contracts. The Court held that whether such cheques became enforceable upon alleged default, and whether the payee was entitled to fill in dates and present them, were matters that could not be conclusively determined in proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, would operate in favour of the complainant and the accused could rebut them at trial. The Court declined to treat the earlier observation that a security cheque would not attract Section 138 as a universal rule applicable to all cases at the quashing stage.
Conclusion: The proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, were not liable to be quashed on this ground as against petitioners 1 and 2.
Issue (ii): Whether a director, who was only designated as such and was not shown to be in charge of or responsible for the company's business in relation to the transactions, could be proceeded against under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Analysis: The record did not show that the third petitioner had any specific role in the affairs of the company or in the transactions that formed the subject matter of the complaints. Mere designation as a director was held insufficient to attract criminal liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, unless the person was shown to have been in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business at the relevant time.
Conclusion: The proceedings were liable to be quashed as against the third petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The challenge succeeded only in part. The criminal proceedings were quashed for the third petitioner, while they were permitted to continue against petitioners 1 and 2.
Ratio Decidendi: A cheque issued in connection with a contract may still attract Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 if the alleged security cheque becomes enforceable upon default, and liability under Section 141 requires specific pleading and material showing that the director was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
