Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority's order rejecting the refund claim as time-barred was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration in light of Notification No. 13/2022-Central Tax dated 05.07.2022.
Analysis: The refund claim had been rejected on limitation, but the petitioner relied on Notification No. 13/2022-Central Tax dated 05.07.2022 to contend that the relevant refund period fell within its coverage. The notification was not available when the impugned orders were passed, yet the underlying factual and legal position was that the refund period was covered by that notification. In these circumstances, the appellate order could not be sustained without reconsideration of the claim on the updated legal position.
Conclusion: The appellate order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.