<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1404 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308546</link>
    <description>A refund claim rejected as time-barred was reconsidered in light of Notification No. 13/2022-Central Tax dated 05.07.2022, since the relevant refund period was stated to fall within its coverage. The court found that the appellate order could not stand without examining the claim against the updated legal position. The matter was therefore remanded to the appellate authority for a fresh decision in accordance with law, after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1404 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308546</link>
      <description>A refund claim rejected as time-barred was reconsidered in light of Notification No. 13/2022-Central Tax dated 05.07.2022, since the relevant refund period was stated to fall within its coverage. The court found that the appellate order could not stand without examining the claim against the updated legal position. The matter was therefore remanded to the appellate authority for a fresh decision in accordance with law, after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>