Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1994 (3) TMI 408 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Arbitration interest income taxable for 1979-80 assessment year, court rules on deductions. The court affirmed that the interest amount awarded by the arbitrator is a revenue receipt taxable for the assessment year 1979-80. It was held that the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Arbitration interest income taxable for 1979-80 assessment year, court rules on deductions.

                          The court affirmed that the interest amount awarded by the arbitrator is a revenue receipt taxable for the assessment year 1979-80. It was held that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting, making the interest amount received during that period assessable. The court also ruled that deductions for interest paid in previous years are not allowable, but deductions for interest paid during the relevant assessment year are permissible. The decisions on all four issues were upheld in favor of the Revenue and the assessee accordingly.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the interest amount of Rs. 36,066.70 is a revenue receipt.
                          2. Whether the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the termination of its business in 1974.
                          3. Whether the assessee is entitled to claim deduction of the interest paid to the Federal Bank during the accounting periods relevant to earlier assessment years.
                          4. Whether the assessee is entitled to claim deduction of the interest paid to the Federal Bank during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1979-80.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Interest Amount as Revenue Receipt:
                          The Tribunal held that the interest amount of Rs. 36,066.70, awarded by the arbitrator for the period from June 1, 1974, to May 29, 1976, on the sum of Rs. 3,00,556 withheld by the public works department, is a revenue receipt. This decision was based on the precedent set in Rockwell Engineering Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1989] 180 ITR 277(Ker), where it was determined that interest awarded due to delayed payment under a contract constitutes a revenue receipt. The Supreme Court in CIT v. Govinda Choudhury and Sons [1993] 203 ITR 881(SC) also supported this view, stating that such interest partakes the same character as the original payment due under the contract. Therefore, the court affirmed that the interest amount is a revenue receipt liable to be taxed for the assessment year 1979-80.

                          2. Cash System of Accounting:
                          The Tribunal, along with the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, concluded that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the termination of its business in 1974. This finding was based on the records of the case and was accepted by the court in the absence of any contrary evidence. Consequently, the interest amount received during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1979-80 was assessable in that year. The court answered this question in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.

                          3. Deduction of Interest Paid to Federal Bank (Previous Years):
                          The assessee claimed deduction of the interest paid to the Federal Bank during previous accounting years from the amounts received under the arbitration award. The Tribunal did not allow this deduction, citing that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the business's termination. The court upheld this view, stating that under section 176(3A) of the Income Tax Act, any sum received after the discontinuance of a business is deemed to be the income of the recipient and charged to tax accordingly in the year of receipt. The court emphasized that only that portion of the receipt which would have been included in the total income of the person during the accounting year as computed in the manner laid down in the Act can be charged to tax. Therefore, the assessee is not entitled to claim deduction of the interest paid during previous assessment years. This question was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.

                          4. Deduction of Interest Paid to Federal Bank (Assessment Year 1979-80):
                          The Department contended that no deduction should be allowed for the interest paid to the Federal Bank during the assessment year 1979-80. However, the court held that the interest paid during the accounting year in which the interest on delayed payment was received must be considered as expenditure for deriving the income from the business. Since the assessee was following the cash system of accounting, the interest paid to the bank during the accounting year must be deducted from the amount received. The court answered this question in the affirmative, against the Department and in favor of the assessee.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court upheld the Tribunal's decisions on all four questions, affirming that the interest amount is a revenue receipt, the assessee was following the cash system of accounting, deductions for interest paid in previous years are not allowable, and deductions for interest paid during the relevant assessment year are allowable.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found