Interest on delayed contract payments under arbitration held business income, not income from other sources, u/s 28

SC held that interest awarded to the assessee-partnership under an arbitration award, arising from delayed contractual payments, constituted business income and not "income from other sources." The Court reasoned that such interest was intrinsically linked to, and partook the same character as, the underlying contractual receipts of the assessee's business activities, and could not be treated as a separate, de hors source of income. Accordingly, the second question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Given the age of the assessment year and the complete factual record, SC itself decided the issue instead of remanding it to HC.

---

---

Issues:
Assessment of interest received by the assessee as revenue receipt and its taxability under the head "Income from other sources."

Analysis:
The case involved a partnership firm engaged in various businesses, including contracting. The dispute centered around interest received by the assessee as part of an arbitration award. The Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner considered the interest as taxable revenue, which the assessee disputed. The Tribunal determined the taxable interest amount to be Rs. 2,77,692. The assessee argued that the interest was in the nature of damages and not taxable. Additionally, the assessee contended that if considered taxable, the interest should be treated as part of trading receipts, subject to a 10% net profit rate. However, the Tribunal ruled the interest as a revenue receipt and fully taxable under "income from other sources," separate from trading receipts.

The High Court initially favored the assessee, holding the interest as a revenue receipt. Subsequently, the Commissioner of Income-tax appealed the decision. During the Supreme Court proceedings, the assessee conceded that the interest was a revenue receipt, leading to the first question being answered in favor of the Revenue. The second question addressed whether the interest should be separated from other amounts under the awards and taxed in full. The Court analyzed that the interest was related to the contracts executed by the assessee and was an accretion to the receipts from those contracts. It concluded that the interest could not be treated as income from other sources, as it was integral to the contract business. Therefore, the second question was answered in favor of the assessee.

Despite the High Court not addressing the second question, the Supreme Court directly answered it due to the age of the assessment year and the availability of all necessary facts. The final decision disposed of the appeal, with the first question decided in favor of the Revenue and the second question in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.

---