Strict bail scrutiny in money laundering cases led to denial of bail after allegations of large-scale investment fraud and asset tracing.

Allegations of large-scale investment fraud, laundering of public funds and attachment of traced assets led the Court to apply a stricter approach to bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Emphasising the scale of the alleged scam, the number of affected investors, the quantum of funds involved and material indicating acquisition and movement of assets from proceeds of crime, the Court treated the matter as an economic offence requiring heightened scrutiny. On that basis, the applicant was found not fit for enlargement on bail and bail was declined.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, having regard to the nature of the alleged economic offence and the restrictions under the bail provision.

Analysis: The application arose from allegations of a large-scale investment fraud involving collection of public funds, alleged laundering of the proceeds, and attachment of properties traced to the alleged crime. The Court noted the scale of the alleged scam, the number of affected investors, the quantum of funds involved, and the material showing acquisition and movement of assets from the alleged proceeds of crime. In considering bail, the Court treated economic offences as requiring a distinct and stricter approach and applied the rigours of the special bail provision under the PMLA.

Conclusion: Bail was declined as the case was not found fit for enlargement on bail.

---