Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether undertrials booked under TADA, in the face of prolonged delay in trial and restricted bail provisions, were entitled to a calibrated scheme of interim release and prioritised trial management.
Analysis: The available figures showed a large backlog of TADA cases and inadequate Designated Courts in several States, making speedy disposal unrealistic in many matters. The stringent bail restrictions under Section 20(8) of TADA were upheld on the assumption that trials would proceed without undue delay, but prolonged incarceration without a near prospect of trial completion implicated Article 21. To reconcile individual liberty with societal interest in combating terrorism, the Court adopted a pragmatic classification of undertrials according to the nature of their alleged involvement. It distinguished hardcore offenders from those with less serious or derivative roles, and it emphasised that Review Committees must scrutinise the application of TADA so that the statute is not invoked unnecessarily.
Conclusion: Special one-time bail directions were issued for eligible TADA undertrials, with stricter treatment for hardcore cases and more liberal treatment for less serious categories, alongside directions for review and priority trial; the writ petition was allowed by way of such relief.