Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the accused-applicants were entitled to anticipatory bail in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in view of the material collected during investigation and the statutory rigour governing bail.
Analysis: Anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy to be granted sparingly and only where the Court is prima facie satisfied that the applicant has been falsely implicated and is unlikely to misuse liberty. Offences of money laundering are treated as economic offences affecting the financial fabric of society and therefore require a stricter approach. The Court considered the complaint material, the investigation record, the alleged proceeds of crime, and the mandate of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and found no basis to dilute the statutory restrictions or to hold that the applicants were entitled to anticipatory protection.
Conclusion: The applicants were not entitled to anticipatory bail and the applications were rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, anticipatory bail cannot be granted as a matter of course and must satisfy the stringent statutory conditions, particularly where the complaint and investigation disclose a prima facie case of money laundering and proceeds of crime.