Modvat credit on warehouse invoices upheld where documents were genuine and the notification was treated as clarificatory.

Modvat credit was held admissible on a manufacturer's warehouse invoice where the transaction was genuine, duty payment and use of inputs in the finished product were undisputed, and no material showed the invoice to be forged or bogus. The Court treated Notification No. 15/94-C.E. (N.T.) and Circular No. 76/76/94-CX as recognizing depot or warehouse invoices as valid Modvat documents, and held the notification to be clarificatory and procedural. Its benefit could not be denied merely because it was stated to operate from 1.04.1994, since the invoice requirement had not been shown to fail on substance.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on invoices issued by a manufacturer from its warehouse before 1.04.1994 in the light of Notification No. 15/94-C.E. (N.T.) dated 30.03.1994 and Circular No. 76/76/94-CX dated 8.11.1994.

Analysis: The invoice and underlying transaction were found to be genuine, and the duty payment, nature of inputs, and their use in the finished product were not disputed. The only objection was that the document did not strictly conform to the prescribed invoice requirements under the then existing Modvat rules. The Court held that the notification and circular recognized depot/warehouse invoices issued by a manufacturer as valid documents for Modvat credit. It further held that the notification was clarificatory and procedural in nature, so its benefit could not be denied merely because it was stated to operate from 1.04.1994, especially when there was no material to show that the invoice was forged or bogus.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible, and the Revenue's challenge failed.

---