TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the demand relating to coke oven gas and the by-products derived therefrom, and whether any substantial question of law arose from that decision.
Analysis: The materials before the Tribunal showed that the impugned inputs had no role in the production of coke oven gas and were used only in producing the by-products. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the demand of 20% and 8% of the value in respect of coke oven gas, which was chargeable to nil rate of duty, was not justified and set aside the order of the authorities below. The High Court found no illegality or irregularity in that conclusion and held that no substantial question of law arose.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's order was upheld and the challenge to it failed.
TaxTMI 
