https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304545 The Tribunal held that the impugned inputs had no role in producing coke oven gas and were used only for the by-products, so the demand of 20% and 8% of the value in respect of coke oven gas, which attracted nil duty, was not justified. The HC found no illegality or irregularity in that conclusion, upheld the Tribunal's order, and held that no substantial question of law arose. en-us Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304545 The Tribunal held that the impugned inputs had no role in producing coke oven gas and were used only for the by-products, so the demand of 20% and 8% of the value in respect of coke oven gas, which attracted nil duty, was not justified. The HC found no illegality or irregularity in that conclusion, upheld the Tribunal's order, and held that no substantial question of law arose. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304545