TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the accused were entitled to discharge under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the basis of the materials collected during investigation, or whether the allegations disclosed sufficient ground to proceed to trial.
Analysis: At the stage of discharge or framing of charge, the court is concerned only with whether the material on record raises a prima facie case or a strong suspicion that the offence has been committed. The court is not to evaluate the probative value of the defence material, conduct a roving inquiry, or decide disputed questions of fact as if holding a mini trial. Specific allegations were made against the husband and the parents-in-law, and the truth or falsity of those allegations could be determined only after evidence was led at trial.
Conclusion: The accused were not entitled to discharge and the refusal to discharge was upheld, against the appellants and in favour of the respondent.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed, the criminal proceedings were allowed to continue, and the parents-in-law were only granted exemption from routine personal appearance before the trial court.
Ratio Decidendi: At the stage of discharge under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the court must proceed on the prosecution material to see whether it discloses a prima facie case or strong suspicion, and it cannot weigh defence material or decide disputed facts by undertaking a mini trial.
TaxTMI 
