Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after redemption of a usufructuary mortgage, the mortgagor could claim mesne profits from the mortgagee when the mortgagor had initiated eviction proceedings against the tenant inducted by the mortgagee and thereby elected to treat that tenant as his own tenant.
Analysis: A mortgagor is ordinarily entitled, on redemption, to actual delivery of possession and not merely a notice to the mortgagee's tenant to attorn, unless the tenant actually attorns and the mortgagor accepts such attornment. Where the mortgagor instead proceeds against the tenant in rent control proceedings on the footing that the tenant is his tenant, that conduct amounts to an unequivocal election between inconsistent rights. Under the principle of election, once such a choice is made with full knowledge, it cannot be retracted, and the mortgagor cannot later treat the mortgagee as continuing in possession for the purpose of claiming mesne profits. The tenant's refusal to attorn does not alter the legal effect of the mortgagor's own conduct.
Conclusion: The mortgagor was precluded by election and estoppel from claiming mesne profits against the mortgagee, and the dismissal of that claim was .