TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands matter for just resolution, emphasizing natural justice and fair defense opportunities.</h1> <h3>STEEL FITTINGS MFG. CO. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., KOLKATA-II</h3> STEEL FITTINGS MFG. CO. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., KOLKATA-II - 2008 (227) E.L.T. 544 (Tri. - Kolkata), 2009 (13) S.T.R. 439 (Tri. - Kolkata) Issues:1. Delay in filing appeal against the order of adjudication2. Condonation of delay and admission of appeal3. Denial of natural justice and violation of principles of natural justice4. Request for copies of documents for defense and remand of the matter for readjudicationAnalysis:1. The appellant filed an appeal with a delay of 14 days against the order of adjudication levying Central Excise duty on various counts. The charges included clandestine manufacturing and clearance of finished goods without following legal procedures or payment of duty, as well as irregular availing of concessional rates leading to duty evasion.2. The appellant sought condonation of the filing delay, explaining that their factory was closed, and steps were consciously taken to file the appeal without any malicious intent. The Tribunal, after hearing both parties, condoned the delay, considering the prejudice the appellant would face due to the substantial demand and penal consequences.3. The appellant raised concerns about denial of natural justice, stating that they were deprived of proper opportunities for defense due to the closure of their factory and unavailability of essential documents. The Tribunal acknowledged the importance of natural justice, emphasizing the necessity of providing copies of relevant documents to enable the appellant to present a robust defense. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for a fair adjudication process.4. The appellant requested copies of documents crucial for their defense, highlighting the need for a fair opportunity to represent their case. The Revenue argued that sufficient opportunities were provided for defense, but the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's contention regarding the unavailability of essential documents. Citing various legal precedents emphasizing natural justice, the Tribunal remanded the matter for readjudication, ensuring the appellant's right to a proper defense.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a just resolution, emphasizing the importance of natural justice and fair opportunities for defense in legal proceedings.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
