Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on compulsory acquisition of land is a capital receipt not chargeable to tax.
Analysis: The amount received under section 28 was treated as part of the enhanced compensation and not as interest for delay in payment. The reasoning followed the settled distinction that amounts awarded under section 28 stand on a different footing from interest under section 34, because section 28 is in the nature of solatium and forms an integral part of compensation. Such receipt is therefore capital in character and does not attract tax as income.
Conclusion: The amount received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act was held to be a capital receipt and not exigible to tax. The addition was deleted and the assessee succeeded on the substantive issue.