Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act could be compounded in revision on the basis of a voluntary compromise between the parties, and whether such composition entitled the petitioner to acquittal.
Analysis: Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act makes every offence punishable under the Act compoundable notwithstanding the Code of Criminal Procedure. The compromise was recorded as voluntary, and the parties affirmed the terms of settlement before the Court. In this situation, compounding could be permitted even at the revisional stage under the Court's power under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The effect of composition under Section 320(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is acquittal of the accused, while Section 320(6) recognises compounding in the course of proceedings.
Conclusion: The offence was validly compounded on the basis of the settlement, and the petitioner was entitled to acquittal. The conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were set aside.
Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded on compromise, resulting in termination of the criminal liability arising from the cheque dishonour prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi: An offence expressly declared compoundable by statute may be compounded at the revisional stage on a voluntary settlement, and such composition operates as an acquittal of the accused.