Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 could be set aside and the accused acquitted on the basis of a voluntary settlement between the parties.
Analysis: The matter stood settled during the pendency of the revision petition and the compromise was accepted by the complainant. Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 makes the offence compoundable notwithstanding the Criminal Procedure Code, and Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 gives composition of an offence the effect of acquittal. In view of the settlement, the offence was fit to be compounded and the conviction could not survive.
Conclusion: The revision petition was allowed, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the petitioner was acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.