Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent should be directed to consider the petitioner's rectification petitions filed under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and pass orders on merits before proceeding further.
Analysis: The rectification petitions had been filed and were pending, while coercive steps were being taken on the revised demand. In these circumstances, the appropriate course was to require consideration of the pending petitions on merits, in accordance with law, after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, and to maintain the status quo until such decision.
Conclusion: The respondent was directed to decide the rectification petitions within four weeks and not to proceed further in the matter until orders were passed.