<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1330 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301407</link>
    <description>Pending rectification petitions under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act required consideration on merits before further coercive action on the revised demand. The High Court directed the respondent to hear the petitioner, decide the rectification petitions in accordance with law within four weeks, and maintain the status quo until orders were passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:12:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1330 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301407</link>
      <description>Pending rectification petitions under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act required consideration on merits before further coercive action on the revised demand. The High Court directed the respondent to hear the petitioner, decide the rectification petitions in accordance with law within four weeks, and maintain the status quo until orders were passed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>