Misdeclared export goods may attract confiscation and penalty, but no redemption fine where shipment has already left the country.

Deliberate misdeclaration of export goods in shipping bills, where buffalo meat was falsely described as frozen tuna fish, was treated as a contravention of customs declaration requirements and exposed the goods to confiscation and the exporter to penal action. However, once the goods had already left the country and were unavailable for confiscation, redemption fine was held inadmissible; the note also records that no further penalty was warranted because no customs revenue loss, unlawful gain, or separate Exim policy violation was shown, and denial of DEPB credit was considered an adequate consequence.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether knowingly misdeclared export goods were liable to confiscation and penal action under the Customs law. (ii) Whether any redemption fine or further penalty was warranted where the goods had already been exported and no customs revenue loss or ulterior gain was shown.

Issue (i): Whether knowingly misdeclared export goods were liable to confiscation and penal action under the Customs law.

Analysis: The export shipping bills falsely described buffalo meat as frozen tuna fish. The misdescription was deliberate and was made to suit the foreign buyer's requirement. Such conduct amounted to contravention of the declaration requirement under the customs law and attracted the confiscatory and penal provisions.

Conclusion: The goods were liable to confiscation and the respondents were liable to penal action.

Issue (ii): Whether any redemption fine or further penalty was warranted where the goods had already been exported and no customs revenue loss or ulterior gain was shown.

Analysis: The goods had already left the country and were not available for confiscation, so redemption fine could not be imposed. The misdeclaration did not yield any financial gain to the respondents, the DEPB benefit had already been denied, and no customs revenue loss or Exim policy violation justified an additional penalty.

Conclusion: No redemption fine and no further penalty were imposable.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue succeeded only to the extent of establishing confiscability and penal liability for the misdeclaration, but the order declined redemption fine and any additional penalty beyond denial of DEPB credit.

Ratio Decidendi: Export goods already taken out of the country cannot be subjected to redemption fine, and where denial of export incentive is an adequate consequence, further penalty may be refused absent revenue loss or unlawful gain.

---