Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether suspension of sentence in revision can be granted to a convict who has not surrendered after the appellate court upheld the conviction.
Analysis: The application sought suspension of sentence during the pendency of revision. The Court held that revisional power under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 permits suspension of execution of sentence only where the sentence remains executable in law and in fact. Reading Sections 387 and 353(6) together, the Court accepted that the subordinate appellate court was obliged to secure the accused's presence for pronouncement of judgment and that, once conviction with substantive sentence stood confirmed, the appellant was bound to surrender. Since the petitioner had absented himself despite efforts made to secure his presence, the Court held that he could not seek suspension of sentence in revision without first complying with the appellate judgment.
Conclusion: The request for suspension of sentence was rejected, and the application was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: A convict who fails to surrender after affirmance of conviction cannot obtain suspension of the sentence in revisional proceedings on that basis.
Ratio Decidendi: Revisional suspension of sentence is unavailable where the conviction and substantive sentence have been affirmed and the convict has not surrendered in compliance with the appellate judgment.