<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1427 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299915</link>
    <description>Revisional suspension of sentence is unavailable where a convict has not surrendered after the appellate court has affirmed the conviction and substantive sentence. Reading Sections 397, 387 and 353(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure together, the HC held that suspension in revision is confined to a sentence that remains executable in law and fact, and that the appellant must comply with the appellate judgment by surrendering before seeking such relief. As the petitioner had remained absent despite efforts to secure his presence, the request for suspension of sentence was rejected and the application dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 05:54:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1427 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299915</link>
      <description>Revisional suspension of sentence is unavailable where a convict has not surrendered after the appellate court has affirmed the conviction and substantive sentence. Reading Sections 397, 387 and 353(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure together, the HC held that suspension in revision is confined to a sentence that remains executable in law and fact, and that the appellant must comply with the appellate judgment by surrendering before seeking such relief. As the petitioner had remained absent despite efforts to secure his presence, the request for suspension of sentence was rejected and the application dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>